INCIDENT EVIDENCE GRAPH
SingularityNET - Rekt
An attacker accessed SingularityNET’s cloud infrastructure. Valid bridge signatures authorized AGIX, WMTX and CGV mints; NTX was minted directly, and 8.72 million FET was drained, and $2.29M in gross liquid proceeds traced. When a signature is treated as proof, who checks whether it tells the truth?
- Victim: SingularityNET
- Actor: attacker
- Method: Accessed SingularityNET cloud infrastructure, used valid bridge signatures to authorize token mints, minted NTX directly, and drained 8.72 million FET